Recent data suggests that almost a third of weekly meetings are unnecessary. While no one seems to enjoy them, it can be difficult to avoid meeting traps when your only communication options are typing up an email, sending a Slack message, or holding a meeting.
Itâs simply all too easy to get burned out, and meeting fatigue is a growing problem that makes it harder for your team to succeed. Extraneous meetings arenât only inefficient, especially when considering the time required to refocus after the unnecessary disruption, but theyâre also costly: US businesses report spending a whopping $37 billion on them annually.
Emails are often equally ineffective, particularly around complex topics. Teams lose thousands of dollars annually because of poorly-written communications. When you need to relay an important message, emails simply are not reliable enough to replace meetings.
Itâs clear that what weâre doing isnât working. Luckily, there is a better way to work together and share information: visual collaboration.Â
Visual collaboration helps teams capture feedback, share ideas, and clarify complex topics in a way that text-based communication (like emails) or verbal communication (like meetings) canât.
With the power of visuals, you may find answering the question, âDo you really need a meeting?â easier than ever.Â
To meet or not to meet
The goal isnât to eliminate meetings altogether, but rather to approach them strategically, in a way thatâs most effective to achieve a desired outcome. A recent experiment conducted at Asana supports this idea. It found that only 30% of time savings comes from canceling meetings entirely. The other 70% comes from redesigning meetingsâmaybe by defining clearer goals, narrowing down the attendees, or transitioning to an asynchronous format.Â
If youâre embracing visual collaboration, you should regularly be questioning if youâre approaching problems from a perspective that truly fosters everyoneâs best workâmeetings or otherwise.Â
So, what does call for a meeting?
There are several things to keep in mind as you determine the best method of communicating with your team:
1. Sensitivity
What is the topic of the communication youâre trying to facilitate? If a conversation could be emotional or controversial, itâs best not to leave its interpretation to written text. You really need to rely on nonverbal cues, like body language and facial expressions, to convey meaning and avoid misunderstandings. If a topic is sensitive, consider a meeting over an asynchronous format.
2. Urgency
How urgent is the topic you want to discuss? Asynchronous communication has a tendency to introduce latency, so if you need to resolve something quickly, a meeting may be the best choice.
Recurring coffee chats or check-ins typically arenât urgent whatsoever. In fact, these types of casual, recurring meetings tend to be one of the most significant contributors to meeting fatigue, even if they were valuable at one point. If non-urgent recurring meetings are never questioned, they can become a major time sink for your team.
3. Complexity
How complex is the information youâre trying to convey?Â
This is the place many people get stuck.
Weâve all received messages saying something along the lines of, âItâs too hard to type out. Can you hop on a call?â A complex topic is traditionally an automatic justification for a meetingâbut should it be?
Visual collaboration fills the communication gap that is left by other tools and software (for example, Slack may help you communicate quickly, but it doesnât necessarily reduce complexity). With visuals, you can quickly convey complex processes, systems, or plans. And while it wonât eliminate all your meetings, visual collaboration increases the threshold you need to reach before something becomes too complex to communicate asynchronously.
4. Goals
Whatâs the ideal end result of this communication?Â
We often resort to default communication habits without strategically considering our goals for the interaction, much less the most efficient way to reach those goals. Teams must intentionally think through their desired outcome for each interaction and decide whether a meeting is the best means of facilitating itâmaybe an email or Slack message really would accomplish your goals just as well. Perhaps the frequency of a meeting could be questioned. Or, itâs possible that opting for an asynchronous visual collaboration activity would fulfill the purpose of the meeting even better (and more efficiently) than the actual meeting would.
We arenât suggesting that sharing feedback, updates, and ideas isnât valuableâit undeniably is. There just may be a more effective approach than youâre currently considering. Again, the goal is intentionality. Strategically design interactions to achieve specific, desired outcomes.Â