Dialogue mapping 101: How to solve problems through visuals

Lucid Content

Reading time: about 7 min

Topics:

Teamwork and collaboration

You’ve heard the old adage “There are two sides to every story.” Well, when it comes to solving complex problems, there are often more than two sides to the issue and even more than one possible solution.

So how can teams see the whole picture?

This is the challenge facing many organizations today. With an increasingly global and remote workforce, sharing knowledge and creating consensus on any issue can seem like an impossible task.

Dialogue mapping is one way that teams can bridge these gaps (in distance, knowledge, and understanding). Here’s how.

What is dialogue mapping?

Dialogue mapping is a facilitation technique used to visualize critical thinking as a group. Created in the 1990s by Jeff Conklin, the method became a popular problem-solving tool for project managers and product developers (as well as other organizational leaders and groups).

Take a look below for an example of dialogue mapping (and click to open an editable version in Lucidchart).

Dialogue Mapping - Budget Example (Click on image to modify online)

Benefits of the dialogue mapping technique

Dialogue mapping gives teams and individuals the tools to understand complex problems and the unique ways each person approaches possible solutions. Here are just a few of the ways dialogue maps can benefit your organization.

Document the group’s discussion over time

Through dialogue mapping, you can keep the team from rehashing the same topics repeatedly while also giving them an opportunity to add new insights to topics addressed earlier should they arise. These documents also make it easier for team members to get up to speed quickly if they missed a meeting.

Help the group identify gaps in their thinking

By visually mapping the discussion, stakeholders can see which topics or issues need further discussion or consideration. This process allows the team to prioritize their time and focus their attention more effectively.

Allow anyone to participate—no special training required

The beauty of dialogue mapping is that only the facilitator needs to have any technical training in the mapping and notational process. Everyone else can simply participate by sharing their thoughts and ideas within the group discussion.

Plus, while the facilitator may be trained to map the dialogue, the IBIS notation is easy to understand visually, so stakeholders can quickly interpret the discussion and get up to speed.

Outline the rationale of a decision

A dialogue map visualizes the group’s thinking and reasoning on an issue, making it easy for stakeholders to quickly identify and understand why and how a decision was made.

Build a shared commitment to the solution

Because dialogue mapping is a comprehensive and collaborative decision-making process, the final result is a solution that each stakeholder contributed to and deeply understands. This level of collaboration is especially important for initiatives that require multi-level buy-in and adoption in an organization.

As such, dialogue mapping can be a powerful tool for building a resilient and agile organization that is better prepared to adapt to changes and challenges in the future.

When to use a dialogue map

The decision-making process can quickly get bogged down when tackling complex or “wicked” problems.

Dialogue maps help teams and organizations collaborate and deliberate on complicated issues more effectively by facilitating a discussion that breaks down each issue and idea. In other words, dialogue maps visualize the critical thinking process, making it easier to consider problems from every angle.

What is a “wicked problem”?

First coined by Horst Rittel and Melvin M. Webber in 1973, “wicked problems” describe problems that are hard to define and difficult to solve. Though the term originally applied to social and cultural issues, it has also been adopted in product development and other business disciplines.

Wicked problems typically share the following characteristics:

There is no definitive end or stopping point.
Solutions are good or bad, rather than true or false.
There is no formula for solving a wicked problem.
Each problem is unique.
Wicked problems are symptoms of other problems.
There are no alternative solutions.
There are multiple explanations for a problem depending on individual perspectives.

In short: Wicked problems are complex issues that don’t have one clear-cut solution.

For project managers and development teams, these issues make it difficult to design and plan solutions with confidence and consensus.

That’s where dialogue mapping comes in.

Dialogue mapping gives diverse teams and groups of stakeholders a system to understand complex problems and visualize their many possible solutions.

Dialogue Mapping - Fun Example (Click on image to modify online)

P.S. If you don't know some of the terms used in this document, make sure to check out our "Lucidchart Explains the Internet" videos!

How to conduct a dialogue mapping session

To conduct a dialogue mapping meeting, you will need:

A diverse team of stakeholders
A designated facilitator
A common diagramming language (IBIS)
A shared “dialogue” map display (either a physical whiteboard or a digital document)

First, gather together your team of problem-solvers, which usually includes a diverse group of individuals, often from different teams or departments (e.g., development, marketing, management, etc.).

By gathering a group of diverse contributors, you can ensure the dialogue (and resulting knowledge) is comprehensive and reflective of the varied perspectives within your organization.

The facilitator (or mapper) guides the group discussion and is responsible for interpreting each individual's ideas and translating them clearly to the shared diagram. The facilitator must be an active listener and good communicator.

During the mapping process, the facilitator listens to each team member’s thoughts, writes the ideas on the diagram and then validates the information, confirming that the ideas were correctly understood and clearly expressed.

Applying IBIS notation to your dialogue map

Dialogue mapping uses the diagram language IBIS (Issue-Based Information System) to notate ideas.

IBIS notation has three elements: issues, ideas, and arguments.

Here’s how they work.

Issues

Issues are the problems or questions being discussed. On the diagram, these are typically framed as questions (e.g., “What should we do about X”).

Issues can be independent or connected to another issue, position, or argument. This allows the team to question and consider every element, giving the group a more comprehensive picture of the main problem.

Ideas

Ideas (or positions) are the responses and proposed solutions to the issue(s). Within IBIS notation, ideas can only respond to issues. This is typically notated with an arrow directed from the idea node to the issue node.

Arguments

Arguments are either for or against an idea (i.e., pros or cons). Arguments are key to mapping out a full analysis with perspectives from different backgrounds. On the map, arguments are only connected to ideas, describing the group’s multiple viewpoints on each idea.

Using Lucidchart to document your dialogue map

Dialogue mapping relies on good diagramming tools and displays to be effective. Not only must the diagram be easy to document, but it must also be easy to share among a diverse group of contributors. The ability to share your dialogue map is particularly important if teams are collaborating remotely (sometimes across time zones or continents).

Lucidchart helps teams and organizations stay on the same page throughout the entire dialogue mapping process. It’s a cloud-based diagramming platform that makes it easy for multiple contributors to collaborate and share ideas in real time—no matter where they’re working from.

Plus, Lucidchart comes equipped with a vast shape library and ready-to-use templates so you can customize your diagrams and start mapping your dialogues right away.

Whether you’re a product manager, CEO, or developer, sharing knowledge and visualizing problems (and their solutions) has never been easier.

Try Lucidchart for free today

About Lucid

Lucid Software is the leader in visual collaboration and work acceleration, helping teams see and build the future by turning ideas into reality. Its products include the Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite (Lucidchart and Lucidspark) and airfocus. The Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite, combined with powerful accelerators for cloud and process transformation, empowers organizations to streamline work, foster alignment, and drive business transformation at scale. airfocus, an AI-powered product management and roadmapping platform, extends these capabilities by helping teams prioritize work, define product strategy, and align execution with business goals. The most used work acceleration platform by the Fortune 500, Lucid's solutions are trusted by more than 100 million users across enterprises worldwide, including Google, GE, and NBC Universal. Lucid partners with leaders such as Google, Atlassian, and Microsoft, and has received numerous awards for its products, growth, and workplace culture.

How you can use creative problem solving at work
Sometimes you're faced with challenges that traditional problem solving can't fix. Creative problem solving encourages you to find new, creative ways of thinking that can help you overcome the issue at hand more quickly.
Problem solving skills for the digital age
Problems are an inevitable part of life and work, but they are also an opportunity to think critically and find solutions. Learn the key elements of problem solving, effective problem solving approaches, and tools to help you arrive at solutions quickly.

Bring your bright ideas to life.

By registering, you agree to our Terms of Service and you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Privacy Policy.

Dialogue mapping 101: How to solve problems through visuals

What is dialogue mapping?

Benefits of the dialogue mapping technique

Document the group’s discussion over time

Help the group identify gaps in their thinking